<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fourth Circuit &#8211; You can go to prison for distributing (very creepy) fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thekaiserlawfirm.com/2009/06/the-fourth-circuit-you-can-go-to-prison-for-distributing-very-creepy-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thekaiserlawfirm.com/2009/06/the-fourth-circuit-you-can-go-to-prison-for-distributing-very-creepy-fiction/</link>
	<description>Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer in Washington DC and Maryland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chip Rood</title>
		<link>http://www.thekaiserlawfirm.com/2009/06/the-fourth-circuit-you-can-go-to-prison-for-distributing-very-creepy-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Rood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.thekaiserlawfirm.com/wp/?p=185#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I am definitely on the side of the First Amendment.  Email is a personal communication and is not released to the public view, as is Facebook, MySpace, or other similar social sites.  Being a personal correspondence, and not in the public view, it should absolutely covered by the First Amendment.

Full Disclosure: I am a book publisher and take the First very, very seriously.  Once you start to tinker with it, it is hard to know when to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely on the side of the First Amendment.  Email is a personal communication and is not released to the public view, as is Facebook, MySpace, or other similar social sites.  Being a personal correspondence, and not in the public view, it should absolutely covered by the First Amendment.</p>
<p>Full Disclosure: I am a book publisher and take the First very, very seriously.  Once you start to tinker with it, it is hard to know when to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.thekaiserlawfirm.com/2009/06/the-fourth-circuit-you-can-go-to-prison-for-distributing-very-creepy-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.thekaiserlawfirm.com/wp/?p=185#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It seems odd for the First Amendment to require talent for its protections to come into play: Lolita is plenty graphic enough to qualify as obscene; Nabokov just used Latinate words for things that sad Mr. Whorely probably typed very literally and in a cliched way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems odd for the First Amendment to require talent for its protections to come into play: Lolita is plenty graphic enough to qualify as obscene; Nabokov just used Latinate words for things that sad Mr. Whorely probably typed very literally and in a cliched way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
